Skip to content
Species

Lophophora diffusa

Read its botanical treatment separately from older hypotheses about ancestry.

Lophophora diffusa — photo 1 of 3
Photo: Amante Darmanin from Malta — CC BY 2.0 · via Wikimedia Commons
Last reviewed: 30 September 2026
← Cactus Codex

Quick facts

FamilyCactaceae
SubfamilyCactoideae
TribeCacteae (subtribe Cactinae)
GenusLophophora J.M.Coult.
Accepted nameLophophora diffusa (Croizat) Bravo (1967)
SynonymsL. koehresii, L. viridescens (incl. subsp. viridescens), subsp. kubesae, var. swobodaiana — see Taxonomy and names
Common namesNo widely documented common name
Native rangeMexico: Querétaro to Hidalgo
Conservation statusIUCN Vulnerable (VU, 2017 amended assessment); CITES Appendix II

Description

The stem is yellow-green, usually flat-topped with a recessed apex, and often sits nearly flush with the soil. Ribs are typically poorly defined, tending toward broad, flat tubercles rather than distinct ridges, with small areoles carrying tufts of wool.

Flowers

Diurnal, white to pale pink or yellowish-white, smaller than in L. williamsii at roughly 1.3–2.2 cm across.

Root

A broad, shallow, tuber-like root.

Wikipedia · Lophophora diffusa ↗

Distribution and habitat

Endemic to a small area of Querétaro, Mexico, between Vizarrón, Bucareli and Tolimán, with populations also reported into neighboring Hidalgo. It grows on limestone soils on slopes and in riverbeds at roughly 1,000–2,000 m elevation, in semi-desert habitat, typically beneath nurse shrubs such as Larrea tridentata and Senegalia sororia.

Wikipedia · Lophophora diffusa ↗

Similar species

The clearest within-genus confusion is a pale or pale-flowered L. williamsii, which usually keeps better-defined ribs and a darker pink flower — see the genus comparison table. L. fricii generally runs more bluish grey-green with larger flowers. Material sold or labelled "koehresii" sits inside L. diffusa in the Kew treatment; it is a separate wild population from the Río Verde–Tula basin that Lophophora specialists treat as its own taxon (see the koehresii profile). Outside the genus, Ariocarpus and Astrophytum asterias are the usual confusions for the whole genus — see the williamsii note for that comparison.

Cultivation

Grown much like the rest of the genus. See the soil-mix guide and the seasonal-care calendar for the reasoning behind each line below.

LightBright light with some relief from the harshest midday sun; more direct sun once acclimated in a mineral mix
SoilA fast-draining, mostly mineral mix — see the soil-mix guide for a tested recipe and simpler starting points
WateringWater and let the mix dry fully through the growing season; keep dry and frost-free over winter — see the seasonal-care calendar
TemperatureProtect from hard frost; the shallow tuberous root and crown are vulnerable to cold, wet conditions
PropagationFrom seed — see the seed-growing guide; grafting onto faster-growing stock speeds early growth without changing identity — see the grafting guide

NC State Extension · Lophophora (genus cultivation notes) ↗

Cultivars and forms

One horticultural name is widely used by growers for a population of this species: L. diffusa var. koehresii Říha (1996), commonly sold simply as "koehresii." Plants of the World Online treats the name as a synonym of L. diffusa at species rank — see Taxonomy and names below — but Continental European systematists have continued to recognize it, while Anglo-American cactus taxonomists have not yet accepted it as a distinct species, so sources disagree on its standing. The town of Tula, in the Mexican state of Tamaulipas, holds the northernmost known population bearing this name. Seed-coat (testa) sculpture has been reported to differ measurably among L. williamsii, L. diffusa, L. diffusa var. koehresii and L. fricii, which is the microscopic evidence growers and some taxonomists point to for keeping "koehresii" distinct in practice even where its formal rank is unsettled.

Kew · Lophophora diffusa ↗ · Terry, M., "Stalking the Wild Lophophora," Parts 1–2, Cactus and Succulent Journal 80, 2008 · Hansen, A., "Lophophora fricii and Lophophora williamsii var. decipiens," 2000.

Taxonomy and names

Kew accepts Lophophora diffusa (Croizat) Bravo, published in 1967. Its synonymy includes L. koehresii (Říha) Bohata, Myšák & Šnicer (basionym L. diffusa var. koehresii Říha, 1996), L. viridescens Halda and subsp. viridescens Halda (1997), subsp. kubesae Halda, Kupčák & Malina (2002) and var. swobodaiana Halda, Kupčák & Malina (2002). None of these is a currently recognized subspecies or variety; Kew treats all of them as synonyms of L. diffusa at species rank. Retain any "koehresii" or other population label exactly as received, together with the supplier record — a taxonomic synonym does not erase a documented source distinction.

Kew · Lophophora diffusa ↗

IUCN lists L. diffusa as Vulnerable (VU) in a 2017 amended assessment: estimated extent of occurrence is roughly 300 km², across fewer than 10 locations, with fewer than 3,000 mature individuals and an estimated decline of 30% or more over 20 years. Principal threats are illegal collection and habitat disturbance. The species is also covered by the family-wide CITES Appendix II listing, which regulates international trade in wild-sourced specimens. Check current local law before acquiring or moving plant material; see the sourcing guide.

References